2025 Realistic ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps Latest PECB Practice Tests Dumps
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps PDF - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Real Exam Questions Answers
The PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam certification exam is a rigorous assessment of an individual’s knowledge and skills in information security management systems. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam consists of multiple choice questions, and candidates must score a minimum of 70% to pass. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam is proctored and can be taken online or in person at a PECB exam center. Candidates who pass the exam will receive a PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer certification, which is valid for three years.
The PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam certification exam covers a wide range of topics related to the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, including risk assessment, security controls, documentation, and continuous improvement. Candidates are required to have a deep understanding of the standard and its requirements, as well as the ability to apply this knowledge in a real-world environment. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam consists of multiple-choice questions and is typically four hours long.
The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam is designed to test the candidate's knowledge of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, its requirements and implementation methodologies, risk assessment techniques, and the best practices for managing and improving an ISMS. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam consists of multiple choice questions and requires the candidate to demonstrate their understanding of the subject matter through practical examples and case studies. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam is available in multiple languages, making it accessible to professionals from all around the world.
NEW QUESTION # 87
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the work accordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Based on his tasks, which team is Bob part of?
- A. Security architecture team
- B. Incident response team
- C. Forensics team
Answer: B
Explanation:
Based on his tasks, Bob is part of the incident response team (IRT) of InfoSec. According to ISO/IEC
27035-2:2023, the IRT is a team of appropriately skilled and trusted members of an organization that responds to and resolves incidents in a coordinated way1. One of the tasks of the IRT is to conduct an evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect1. This is consistent with Bob's responsibility of ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted. Therefore, Bob belongs to the incident response team.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2023 (en), Information technology - Information security incident management - Part 2: Guidelines to plan and prepare for incident response1
* Response to Information Security Incidents | ISMS.online2
NEW QUESTION # 88
Scenario 5: Operaze is a small software development company that develops applications for various companies around the world. Recently, the company conducted a risk assessment to assess the information security risks that could arise from operating in a digital landscape. Using different testing methods, including penetration Resting and code review, the company identified some issues in its ICT systems, including improper user permissions, misconfigured security settings, and insecure network configurations. To resolve these issues and enhance information security, Operaze decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001.
Considering that Operaze is a small company, the entire IT team was involved in the ISMS implementation project. Initially, the company analyzed the business requirements and the internal and external environment, identified its key processes and activities, and identified and analyzed the interested parties In addition, the top management of Operaze decided to Include most of the company's departments within the ISMS scope. The defined scope included the organizational and physical boundaries. The IT team drafted an information security policy and communicated it to all relevant interested parties In addition, other specific policies were developed to elaborate on security issues and the roles and responsibilities were assigned to all interested parties.
Following that, the HR manager claimed that the paperwork created by ISMS does not justify its value and the implementation of the ISMS should be canceled However, the top management determined that this claim was invalid and organized an awareness session to explain the benefits of the ISMS to all interested parties.
Operaze decided to migrate Its physical servers to their virtual servers on third-party infrastructure. The new cloud computing solution brought additional changes to the company Operaze's top management, on the other hand, aimed to not only implement an effective ISMS but also ensure the smooth running of the ISMS operations. In this situation, Operaze's top management concluded that the services of external experts were required to implement their information security strategies. The IT team, on the other hand, decided to initiate a change in the ISMS scope and implemented the required modifications to the processes of the company.
Based on scenario 5. in which category of the interested parties does the MR manager of Operaze belong?
- A. Negatively influenced interested parties, because the HR Department will deal with more documentation
- B. Both A and B
- C. Positively influenced interested parties, because the ISMS will increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the HR Department
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001, interested parties are those who can affect, be affected by, or perceive themselves to be affected by the organization's information security activities, products, or services. Interested parties can be classified into four categories based on their influence and interest in the ISMS:
Positively influenced interested parties: those who benefit from the ISMS and support its implementation and operation Negatively influenced interested parties: those who are adversely affected by the ISMS and oppose its implementation and operation High-interest interested parties: those who have a strong interest in the ISMS and its outcomes, regardless of their influence Low-interest interested parties: those who have a weak interest in the ISMS and its outcomes, regardless of their influence In scenario 5, the HR manager of Operaze belongs to the category of negatively influenced interested parties, because he/she perceives that the ISMS will create more paperwork and documentation for the HR Department, and therefore opposes its implementation and operation. The HR manager does not benefit from the ISMS and does not support its objectives and requirements.
References:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clause 4.2: Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Annex A.18.1.4: Assessment of and decision on information security events ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 2: Introduction to Information Security Management System (ISMS) concepts as required by ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 4: Planning the ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 6: Implementing the ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 7: Performance evaluation, monitoring and measurement of the ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 8: Continual improvement of the ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 9: Preparing for the ISMS certification audit
NEW QUESTION # 89
Which of the following statements is accurate regarding the methodology for managing the implementation of an ISMS?
- A. The sequence of steps must remain fixed throughout the ISMS implementation
- B. Organizations must strictly follow a specific methodology to meet the minimum requirements
- C. Organizations can adapt the methodology to their specific context, and steps can be modified as needed
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 90
An organization has justified the exclusion of control 5.18 Access rights of ISO/IEC 27001 in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) as follows: "An access control reader is already installed at the main entrance of the building." Which statement is correct'
- A. The justification is not acceptable because it does not indicate that it has been selected based on the risk assessment results
- B. The justification for the exclusion of a control is not required to be included in the SoA
- C. The justification is not acceptable, because it does not reflect the purpose of control 5.18
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3, the Statement of Applicability (SoA) is a document that identifies the controls that are applicable to the organization's ISMS and explains why they are selected or not.
The SoA is based on the results of the risk assessment and risk treatment, which are the previous steps in the risk management process. Therefore, the justification for the exclusion of a control should be based on the risk assessment results and the risk treatment plan, and should reflect the purpose and objective of the control.
Control 5.18 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is about access rights to information and other associated assets, which should be provisioned, reviewed, modified and removed in accordance with the organization's topic-specific policy on and rules for access control. The purpose of this control is to prevent unauthorized access to, modification of, and destruction of information assets. Therefore, the justification for the exclusion of this control should explain why the organization does not need to implement this control to protect its information assets from unauthorized access.
The justification given by the organization in the question is not acceptable, because it does not reflect the purpose of control 5.18. An access control reader at the main entrance of the building is a physical security measure, which is related to control 5.15 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, not control 5.18. Control 5.18 is about logical access rights to information systems and services, which are not addressed by the access control reader.
Therefore, the organization should either provide a valid justification for the exclusion of control 5.18, or include it in the SoA and implement it according to the risk assessment and risk treatment results.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3, control 5.18; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 5, slide 18, Module 6, slide 10.
NEW QUESTION # 91
What is the main purpose of Annex A 7.1 Physical security perimeters of ISO/IEC 27001?
- A. To maintain the confidentiality of information that is accessible by personnel or external parties
- B. To prevent unauthorized physical access, damage, and interference to the organization's information and other associated assets
- C. To ensure access to information and other associated assets is defined and authorized
Answer: B
Explanation:
Annex A 7.1 of ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 is a control that requires an organization to define and implement security perimeters and use them to protect areas that contain information and other associated assets. Information and information security assets can include data, infrastructure, software, hardware, and personnel. The main purpose of this control is to prevent unauthorized physical access, damage, and interference to these assets, which could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information. Physical security perimeters can include fences, walls, gates, locks, alarms, cameras, and other barriers or devices that restrict or monitor access to the facility or area. The organization should also consider the environmental and fire protection of the assets, as well as the disposal of any waste or media that could contain sensitive information.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer Study Guide, Section 5.3.1.7, page 101 ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer Info Kit, page 17 ISO/IEC 27002 : 2022, Control 7.1 - Physical Security Perimeters123
NEW QUESTION # 92
Which statement is an example of risk retention?
- A. An organization terminates work in the construction site during a severe storm
- B. An organization has implemented a data loss protection software
- C. An organization has decided to release the software even though some minor bugs have not been fixed yet
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 93
Scenario 8: SunDee is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, US. Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, SunDee places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. SunDee has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.
In preparation for the recertification audit, SunDee conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment, Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.
During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader.
SunDee's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvement. Decisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow-up action plans, which were then approved by top management.
In response to the review outcomes, SunDee promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its information security measures. Additionally, dashboard tools were introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities. Furthermore, SunDee embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes. The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Based on scenario 8, which of the following dashboards did SunDee utilize?
- A. Tactical dashboards
- B. Strategic dashboards
- C. Operational dashboards
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 94
Scenario 3: Socket Inc is a telecommunications company offering mainly wireless products and services. It uses MongoDB. a document model database that offers high availability, scalability, and flexibility.
Last month, Socket Inc. reported an information security incident. A group of hackers compromised its MongoDB database, because the database administrators did not change its default settings, leaving it without a password and publicly accessible.
Fortunately. Socket Inc. performed regular information backups in their MongoDB database, so no information was lost during the incident. In addition, a syslog server allowed Socket Inc. to centralize all logs in one server. The company found out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was not initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing the event logs that record user faults and exceptions.
To prevent similar incidents in the future, Socket Inc. decided to use an access control system that grants access to authorized personnel only. The company also implemented a control in order to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, and regulations, and the information classification scheme. To improve security and reduce the administrative efforts, network segregation using VPNs was proposed.
Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, and integrate information security into project management.
Based on scenario 3. which information security control of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 did Socket Inc. implement by establishing a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats?
- A. Annex A 5.5 Contact with authorities
- B. Annex A 5.13 Labeling of information
- C. Annex A 5 7 Threat Intelligence
Answer: C
Explanation:
Annex A 5.7 Threat Intelligence is a new control in ISO 27001:2022 that aims to provide the organisation with relevant information regarding the threats and vulnerabilities of its information systems and the potential impacts of information security incidents. By establishing a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, Socket Inc. implemented this control and improved its ability to prevent, detect, and respond to information security incidents.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A 5.7 Threat Intelligence ISO/IEC 27002:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection controls, Clause 5.7 Threat Intelligence PECB ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer Course, Module 6: Implementation of Information Security Controls Based on ISO/IEC 27002:2022, Slide 18: A.5.7 Threat Intelligence
NEW QUESTION # 95
Scenario 8: SunDee is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, US. Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, SunDee places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. SunDee has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.
In preparation for the recertification audit, SunDee conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment, Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.
During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader.
SunDee's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvement. Decisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow-up action plans, which were then approved by top management.
In response to the review outcomes, SunDee promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its information security measures. Additionally, dashboard tools were introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities. Furthermore, SunDee embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes. The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Is Alex suitable for the position of internal auditor within the company?
- A. Yes, Alex's recent experience in the day-to-day operations of the Compliance Department would benefit the internal auditor role
- B. No, the internal audit can be conducted only by individuals who have not had operational roles
- C. No, Alex should wait for a reasonable period of time to pass before transitioning to the internal auditor position
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 96
Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS.
However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body NetworkFuse should_________________to ensure that employees are prepared for the audit. Refer to scenario
10.
- A. Conduct practice interviews
- B. Select a certification body that provides combined audits
- C. Observe the technologies used
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
One of the ways to prepare employees for an ISO/IEC 27001 audit is to conduct practice interviews with them.
This can help them to familiarize themselves with the audit process, the types of questions they might be asked, and the evidence they need to provide to demonstrate compliance with the standard. Practice interviews can also help employees to identify any gaps or weaknesses in their knowledge or performance, and to address them before the actual audit. Practice interviews can be conducted by internal auditors, managers, or consultants, and should cover the relevant scope, objectives, and criteria of the audit. (From the PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course Manual, page 113) References:
PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course Manual, page 113
PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Info Kit, page 10
5 Step Plan: How to Prepare for an ISO 27001 Certification Audit
NEW QUESTION # 97
Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS.
However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Does NetworkFuse fulfill the prerequisites for a certification audit?
- A. Yes, because the ISMS must be operational for at least one year prior to the certification audit
- B. Yes, because internal audits and management reviews have been performed
- C. Yes, because the certification body has been selected
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27006:2015, the prerequisites for a certification audit are:
* The ISMS must be operational for a period of time that is sufficient to demonstrate its effectiveness and performance.
* The organization must have conducted at least one internal audit and one management review of the ISMS prior to the certification audit.
* The organization must provide the certification body with access to all the relevant documented information, records, personnel, and facilities related to the ISMS.
In the scenario, NetworkFuse has fulfilled these prerequisites, as it has had an operational ISMS for approximately two years, and it has performed internal audits and management reviews. Therefore, the correct answer is B.
References: ISO/IEC 27006:2015, clauses 9.1.1, 9.1.2, and 9.2.1.
NEW QUESTION # 98
What should an organization allocate to ensure the maintenance and improvement of the information security management system?
- A. The appropriate transfer to operations
- B. The documented information required by ISO/IEC 27001
- C. Sufficient resources, such as the budget, qualified personnel, and required tools
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.2.2, the organization shall define and apply an information security incident management process that includes the following activities:
reporting information security events and weaknesses;
assessing information security events and classifying them as information security incidents; responding to information security incidents according to their classification; learning from information security incidents, including identifying causes, taking corrective actions and preventive actions, and communicating the results and actions taken; collecting evidence, where applicable.
The standard does not specify who should perform these activities, as long as they are done in a consistent and effective manner. Therefore, the organization may choose to conduct forensic investigation internally or by using external consultants, depending on its needs, resources, and capabilities. However, the organization should ensure that the external consultants are competent, trustworthy, and comply with the organization's policies and procedures.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 10.2.2; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 10: Incident Management.
NEW QUESTION # 99
Which tool is used to identify, analyze, and manage interested parties?
- A. The power/interest matrix
- B. The probability/impact matrix
- C. The likelihood/severity matrix
Answer: A
Explanation:
The power/interest matrix is a tool that can be used to identify, analyze, and manage interested parties according to ISO/IEC 27001:2022. The power/interest matrix is a two-dimensional diagram that plots the level of power and interest of each interested party in relation to the organization's information security objectives.
The power/interest matrix can help the organization to prioritize the interested parties, understand their expectations and needs, and develop appropriate communication and engagement strategies. The power/interest matrix can also help the organization to identify potential risks and opportunities related to the interested parties.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 4.2; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 4, slide 12.
NEW QUESTION # 100
Which of the situations below can negatively affect the internal audit process?
- A. Restricting the internal auditor's access to offices and documentation
- B. Reporting the internal audit results to the top management
- C. Conducting internal audit interviews with all employees of the organization
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 101
An organization uses Platform as a Services (PaaS) to host its cloud-based services As such, the cloud provider manages most off the services to the organization. However, the organization still manages____________________
- A. Application and data
- B. Servers and storage
- C. Operating system and visualization
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 102
Scenario 4: TradeB is a newly established commercial bank located in Europe, with a diverse clientele. It provides services that encompass retail banking, corporate banking, wealth management, and digital banking, all tailored to meet the evolving financial needs of individuals and businesses in the region. Recognizing the critical importance of information security in the modern banking landscape, TradeB has initiated the implementation of an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. To ensure the successful implementation of the ISMS, the top management decided to contract two experts to lead and oversee the ISMS implementation project.
As a primary strategy for implementing the ISMS, the experts chose an approach that emphasizes a swift implementation of the ISMS by initially meeting the minimum requirements of ISO/IEC 27001, followed by continual improvement over time. Additionally, under the guidance of the experts, TradeB opted for a methodological framework, which serves as a structured framework and a guideline that outlines the high-level stages of the ISMS implementation, the associated activities, and the deliverables without incorporating any specific tools.
The experts analyzed the ISO/IEC 27001 controls and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and its objectives. Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on a methodical approach that involved defining and characterizing the terms and criteria used in the assessment process, categorizing them into non-numerical levels (e.g., very low, low, moderate, high, very high). Explanatory notes were thoughtfully crafted to justify assessed values, with the primary goal of enhancing repeatability and reproducibility.
Then, they evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria, where they decided to treat only the risks of the high-risk category. Additionally, they focused primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures. To address these issues, they established a new version of the access control policy, implemented controls to manage and control user access, and introduced a control for ICT readiness to ensure business continuity.
Their risk assessment report indicated that if the implemented security controls reduce the risk levels to an acceptable threshold, those risks will be accepted.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which of the actions presented in scenario 4 is NOT compliant with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001?
- A. TradeB selected only ISO/IEC 27001 controls deemed applicable to the company
- B. TradeB drafted the Statement of Applicability before conducting the risk assessment
- C. TradeB decided to treat only the risks of the high-risk category
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 103
......
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Premium Exam Engine pdf Download: https://prepaway.vcetorrent.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer-valid-vce-torrent.html